聲援文林苑反都更 今明開講

2012/03/24
自由時報

〔記者黃其豪／台北報導〕士林「文林苑」都更爭議，經過連日來支持、反對都更的地主各自表達訴求，昨天暫時休兵，聲援拒絕都更王家的台灣都更受害者聯盟、學生團體，養精蓄銳，並籌劃說明會，準備走上街頭宣講，讓民眾了解文林苑真相。

台灣都更受害者聯盟理事長彭龍三說，聲援的團體要讓更多人了解，文林苑都更案不是一件單純的建商與住戶的價格角力，因為王家從頭到尾都不要合建、不參與都更，且沒拿過建商一毛錢。

彭龍三強調，王家小蝦米對上大鯨魚，是一樁力抗建商藉由都更條例的漏洞對現住戶蠶食鯨吞的實例，文林苑都更案是不懂都更程序的合法住民，被強劃入都更範圍，恐遭強拆的事件，聲援者要凸顯都更條例不周延的地方，而自辦都更過程中，遭迫害的很可能是你我的家庭，這是違背憲法保障人民財產、居住權的案例。

台灣都更受害者聯盟呼籲關心都市更新的民眾加入志工行列，聯盟今天下午一點在王家前廣場舉行訓練會，為之後街頭宣講做準備，明天晚間八點在同一地點，將由律師詹順貴主講市府、地主、建商三贏方案，王家也會講述文林苑都更案來龍去脈，歡迎老厝邊回來相聚。 聲援文林苑反對都更王家的學生，以圖示向到場關切的民眾，說明都更實施者圈地遊戲所製造多數決的假象。（記者黃其豪攝）

臉書討論

回應

由 訪客 (未驗證) 在 2012/03/25 07:53 發表

http://iservice.libertytimes.com.tw/IService2/search.php?conditions=and&...

國際連署正式展開! 歡迎各位朋友透過自己的網絡向全世界傳播! (感謝台權會代為擬稿)

Call for endorsement
Urgent Appeal
Taiwan: Stop Forced Eviction of Shih-Lin Wang Families and Revise the Urban Renewal Act Now

March 23, 2012

Taiwan is always proud of its democratic progress and human rights protection in Asia region. However, more and more government sanctioned renewal projects without procedural due process and more and more forced evictions for the interests of development companies are now taking place in Taiwan.

The Wang families have resided in Shih-Lin district, Taipei city for more than half centuries. They built their houses in the land in compliance with every regulation and law in Taiwan. However, because of the urban renewal project proposed by the Le Young Construction Company, the Wang families are forced to become a part of the government sanctioned renewal zone without any notifications of public hearings. It is both a clear violation of the due process of law and an infringement of Wang’s legitimate rights since the Wang families have firmly rejected the offer from the company to be part of the renewal project in the very beginning stage.

Indeed, the renewal project could proceed without the lands of Wang families because their lands do not constitute an essential part of the renewal. Wang’s have long requested the city government to exclude their lands from the renewal zone. However, the government is inclined to abide by the interests of the development company rather than to protect the legitimate rights of citizens. All the appeals to the administrative courts also failed on the grounds that the notification of public hearings of a renewal zoning needed not be actually delivered by the development company to the parties concerned.

The key issues are caused by the flaws and problems in the Urban Renewal Act. According to the Article 11, the scope of the renewal zoning could be drawn by any developer at will without the actual notice of land owners affected. Article 22 also allows the developers to get renewal permit without consensus from all residents or owners even though they may have refused to be part of the renewal zone. Furthermore, Article 36 allows the developers to resort to public authorities to evict the residents and demolish their houses. The Wang’s already received the notification from Taipei City Government and the mayor Mr. Hao also vowed to tear down the houses soon.

The case of Wang families is not a single incidence. There are many urban families in Taiwan now facing the similar situations.

Taiwan government has ratified ICCPR and ICESCR and passed the Enforcement Act of Two Covenants by its Legislative Yuan in 2009. Thus, Taiwan government indeed has the obligation to respect and protect the right to adequate housing according to ICESCR no.11 and the ICESCR general comment no.7.

The forced evictions of the citizens’ houses for the interests of the construction company are clearly not in the interests of public benefit or welfare.

We strongly urge Taiwan government to

1) Stop the forced eviction of the Wang families
2) Organize a consult meeting for the other families who are in threat of forced evictions
3) Revise the Urban Renewal Act in accordance with the Constitution in Taiwan and ICESCR

The urgent appeal is endorsed by the following NGOs (Taiwan):
Taiwan Association for Human Rights , Taiwan Urban Renewal, OURs (The Organization of Urban Re-s), EJT (Environmental Jurists Association), NFIU (National Federation of Independent Trade Unions), G/S RAT (Gender/Sexuality Rights Association Taiwan), Collective Of Sex Workers And Supporters, Green Citizen’s Action Alliance, Catholic Scalabrini International Migration Network-Taiwan, Taiwan International Workers Association, CAFC (Concern Alliance for Filipino Chinese), RCAN (Raging Citizens Act Now), TAVOI (Taiwan Association For Victims of Occupation Injuries), Youth Labor 95 Union, Center for Social GIS, Taiwan Watch Institute, SocGIS, Center for the Study of Sexualities of National Central University, Mee, Career Foundation, Center for Social GIS of Soochow University, Greenink, Lab.TCHENOGRAMME, Booster Machine Co., Oz Theatre Company, Gorilla Guerrilla for People, 1000mountain, Sanchong Community University (continue updating)…

由 訪客 (未驗證) 在 2012/03/29 01:12 發表

憲法第十條規定人民有居住、遷徙之自由，旨在保障人民有自由設定住居所、遷徙、旅行，包括入出國境之權利。臺北市都市更新自治條例已經明顯違憲。目前被拆戶只有國賠一途，並促進修法。

由 thy (未驗證) 在 2012/03/29 11:47 發表

個人看法:

若是為公共建設，徵收民地，非本文論點。若是人民間的利益平衡問題，當局不宜選邊介入。雖然不涉政治立場鬥爭，但也容易讓有心人見縫插針。 利益平衡問題如果是立法以公制私，是否與社會主義相似，請教大家:

1、之前，建方與王家尚未協商完成，不該急著動手拆屋，讓我感覺似乎財團有 霸王硬上弓 先斬後奏或強梁壓境或以多暴寡之嫌?

2、事涉人民居住自由和私有財產權，不該以民主自由為名，立法剝奪，造成多數凌暴少數，公權力霸凌弱勢之遺憾，呼籲當局儘速廢止惡法，以杜重演。

3、文林苑案，除非兩造走完司法程序，政府當局不應介入強制拆屋，如今予人有協助財團強制徵收私地之感，事實上，當局應以協助兩造取得利益平衡，才是上策之圖。

由 訪客 (未驗證) 在 2012/03/29 18:49 發表

大家都在引述憲法第十條

有沒有人專心去看看憲法第二十六條過？

由 阿樺 (未驗證) 在 2012/03/29 22:35 發表

聲援文林苑反都更，看到這一次事件，政府是生病了嗎！竟然用公務人員依法行政的說塘塞，真是夠誇張

由 訪客 (未驗證) 在 2012/03/30 02:13 發表

政府不應該過度依賴建商來進行都市更新,都市更新的最大利益在於原有土地上的建築容積增加了(這是建商最大利益所在)!許多人以為都更後分到了新房子車位而獲利!事實上原地主所持有的土地持分卻變少了還必須繳納土地增值稅(如果已居住幾十年的住戶土地增值稅嚇死人)!土地才是永久價值(房子舊了可以一直重建)!因都市計畫而增加出來的建築容積不該是落入財團的利益來源,它可以轉換是原住戶改建所需的建築經費來源甚至是成為政府的資產供為所謂國宅(只擁有地上房屋所有權以成為政府抑制房價高漲的工具)政府應提供一套機制,結合建築師及建築經理管理公司及銀行信託的合作來協助老舊房屋進行更新,以原地主土地持分不變作為公平分配原則,達到因社會進步所帶來的新資源公平分配給公眾的正義!